The problem here was that the openldap binaries had /tmp/... in their
RPATH *before* $out/lib, so patchelf --shrink-rpath considered the
$out/lib entry unused.
As a workaround, use NIX_LDFLAGS_BEFORE to ensure a proper order.
In the tarball job:
````
checking find-tarballs.nix
error: while evaluating anonymous function at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:6:1, called from undefined position:
while evaluating ‘operator’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:27:16, called from undefined position:
while evaluating ‘immediateDependenciesOf’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:39:29, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:27:44:
while evaluating anonymous function at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/attrsets.nix:224:10, called from undefined position:
while evaluating anonymous function at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:40:37, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/attrsets.nix:224:16:
while evaluating ‘derivationsIn’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:42:19, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:40:40:
while evaluating ‘optional’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/lists.nix:175:20, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:44:33:
while evaluating ‘canEval’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:48:13, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:44:43:
while evaluating the attribute ‘pkgs’ of the derivation ‘ruby-dev-2.3.1-p0’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders.nix:10:14:
while evaluating ‘override’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/customisation.nix:60:22, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/interpreters/ruby/dev.nix:10:13:
while evaluating ‘makeOverridable’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/customisation.nix:54:24, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/customisation.nix:60:31:
anonymous function at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/ruby-modules/bundix/default.nix:1:1 called with unexpected argument ‘ruby’, at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/customisation.nix:56:12
````
This update was generated by hackage2nix v2.0.1 using the following inputs:
- Hackage: 0752bfd4f0
- LTS Haskell: e602b68df3
- Stackage Nightly: f7407f2e81
This was one of the ways to build packages, we are trying
hard to minimize different ways so it's easier for newcomers
to learn only one way.
This also:
- removes texLive (old), fixes#14807
- removed upstream-updater, if that code is still used it should be in
separate repo
- changes a few packages like gitit/mit-scheme to use new texlive
Otherwise it would pick various -march flags based on the CPU of the
compiling system, using beautiful code like this:
````
63 AC_CACHE_CHECK(for x86 cpuid $1 output, ax_cv_gcc_x86_cpuid_$1,
64 [AC_RUN_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([#include <stdio.h>], [
65 int op = $1, eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
66 FILE *f;
67 __asm__("cpuid"
68 : "=a" (eax), "=b" (ebx), "=c" (ecx), "=d" (edx)
69 : "a" (op));
70 f = fopen("conftest_cpuid", "w"); if (!f) return 1;
71 fprintf(f, "%x:%x:%x:%x\n", eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
72 fclose(f);
73 return 0;
74 ])],
...
121 AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether avx is supported], [ax_cv_have_avx_ext],
122 [
123 ax_cv_have_avx_ext=no
124 if test "$((0x$ecx>>28&0x01))" = 1; then
125 ax_cv_have_avx_ext=yes
126 fi
127 ])
````
