Add comments about the module system interface
Ideally the module system could be configured pretty much completely by the contents of the modules themselves, so add comments about avoiding complicating it further and possibly removing now-redundant configurability from the existing interface.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e3eff53037
commit
0a0a29fd0b
@ -9,8 +9,19 @@ rec {
|
||||
|
||||
/* Evaluate a set of modules. The result is a set of two
|
||||
attributes: ‘options’: the nested set of all option declarations,
|
||||
and ‘config’: the nested set of all option values. */
|
||||
evalModules = { modules, prefix ? [], args ? {}, check ? true }:
|
||||
and ‘config’: the nested set of all option values.
|
||||
!!! Please think twice before adding to this argument list! The more
|
||||
that is specified here instead of in the modules themselves the harder
|
||||
it is to transparently move a set of modules to be a submodule of another
|
||||
config (as the proper arguments need to be replicated at each call to
|
||||
evalModules) and the less declarative the module set is. */
|
||||
evalModules = { modules
|
||||
, prefix ? []
|
||||
, # !!! This can be specified modularly now, can we remove it?
|
||||
args ? {}
|
||||
, # !!! This can be specified modularly now, can we remove it?
|
||||
check ? true
|
||||
}:
|
||||
let
|
||||
internalModule = rec {
|
||||
_file = ./modules.nix;
|
||||
@ -21,6 +32,7 @@ rec {
|
||||
__internal.args = mkOption {
|
||||
description = "Arguments passed to each module.";
|
||||
|
||||
# !!! Should this be types.uniq types.unspecified?
|
||||
type = types.attrsOf types.unspecified;
|
||||
|
||||
internal = true;
|
||||
|
@ -200,7 +200,12 @@ in rec {
|
||||
let
|
||||
coerce = def: if isFunction def then def else { config = def; };
|
||||
modules = opts' ++ map (def: { _file = def.file; imports = [(coerce def.value)]; }) defs;
|
||||
in (evalModules { inherit modules; args.name = last loc; prefix = loc; }).config;
|
||||
in (evalModules {
|
||||
inherit modules;
|
||||
# !!! See comment about args in lib/modules.nix
|
||||
args.name = last loc;
|
||||
prefix = loc;
|
||||
}).config;
|
||||
getSubOptions = prefix: (evalModules
|
||||
{ modules = opts'; inherit prefix;
|
||||
# FIXME: hack to get shit to evaluate.
|
||||
|
@ -2,12 +2,24 @@
|
||||
# configuration object (`config') from which we can retrieve option
|
||||
# values.
|
||||
|
||||
{ system ? builtins.currentSystem
|
||||
, pkgs ? null
|
||||
, baseModules ? import ../modules/module-list.nix
|
||||
, extraArgs ? {}
|
||||
# !!! Please think twice before adding to this argument list!
|
||||
# Ideally eval-config.nix would be an extremely thin wrapper
|
||||
# around lib.evalModules, so that modular systems that have nixos configs
|
||||
# as subcomponents (e.g. the container feature, or nixops if network
|
||||
# expressions are ever made modular at the top level) can just use
|
||||
# types.submodule instead of using eval-config.nix
|
||||
{ # !!! system can be set modularly, would be nice to remove
|
||||
system ? builtins.currentSystem
|
||||
, # !!! is this argument needed any more? The pkgs argument can
|
||||
# be set modularly anyway.
|
||||
pkgs ? null
|
||||
, # !!! what do we gain by making this configurable?
|
||||
baseModules ? import ../modules/module-list.nix
|
||||
, # !!! See comment about args in lib/modules.nix
|
||||
extraArgs ? {}
|
||||
, modules
|
||||
, check ? true
|
||||
, # !!! See comment about check in lib/modules.nix
|
||||
check ? true
|
||||
, prefix ? []
|
||||
, lib ? import ../../lib
|
||||
}:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user